DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda Proceed vs 1996 Toyota Mark II Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Proceed

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeToyota
ProceedModelMark II
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2446 cc
125 HPPower97 HP
294 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
265/70 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4990 mmLength4760 mm
1810 mmWidth1760 mm
1815 mmHeight1400 mm
1830 KgWeight1400 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda Proceed and 1996 Toyota Mark II approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Proceed leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…