DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi A6 vs 1996 Mazda Proceed Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Proceed

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMazda
A6ModelProceed
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2461 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
115 HPPower125 HP
265 NmTorque294 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size265/70 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4797 mmLength4990 mm
1783 mmWidth1810 mm
1430 mmHeight1815 mm
1460 KgWeight1830 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi A6 and 1996 Mazda Proceed approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Proceed leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…