DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-6 vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLand Rover
MX-6ModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
2+2Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
220 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
165 HPPower177 HP
217 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,0 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
205/55 R15 87 VTyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4610 mmLength4433 mm
1750 mmWidth1809 mm
1310 mmHeight1709 mm
1205 KgWeight1550 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-6 and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…