DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Mazda MX-6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
FreelanderModelMX-6
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
3Doors2

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
182 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
177 HPPower165 HP
240 NmTorque217 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption11,0 lt
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size205/55 R15 87 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4610 mm
1809 mmWidth1750 mm
1709 mmHeight1310 mm
1550 KgWeight1205 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Mazda MX-6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…