DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mazda MX-6 vs 1992 Volvo 960 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 960

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-6SpecificationVolvo 960
MazdaMakeVolvo
MX-6Model960
1992Model year1992
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Mazda MX-6SpecificationVolvo 960
8,0 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2383 cc
165 HPPower115 HP
217 NmTorque225 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-6SpecificationVolvo 960
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,0 ltUrban consumption11 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-6SpecificationVolvo 960
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/55 R15 87 VTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-6SpecificationVolvo 960
4610 mmLength4871 mm
1750 mmWidth1750 mm
1310 mmHeight1411 mm
1205 KgWeight1600 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mazda MX-6 and 1992 Volvo 960 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…