DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Volvo 960 vs 1992 Mazda MX-6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 960

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo 960SpecificationMazda MX-6
VolvoMakeMazda
960ModelMX-6
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

Volvo 960SpecificationMazda MX-6
—0–100 km/h8,0 s
180 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2383 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
115 HPPower165 HP
225 NmTorque217 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo 960SpecificationMazda MX-6
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
11 ltUrban consumption11,0 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo 960SpecificationMazda MX-6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R15 87 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo 960SpecificationMazda MX-6
4871 mmLength4610 mm
1750 mmWidth1750 mm
1411 mmHeight1310 mm
1600 KgWeight1205 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Volvo 960 and 1992 Mazda MX-6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…