2014 • Audi
A4
Audi A4 3.0 TDI V6 (204 Hp) 2014Overall Score81.75/100
2014 Audi A4 vs 2016 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 Hp) 2016Overall Score82.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi A4SpecificationFord Ranger
AudiMakeFord
A4ModelRanger
2014Model year2016
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Audi A4SpecificationFord Ranger
7,7 s0–100 km/h—
244 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement3198 cc
204 HPPower200 HP
400 NmTorque470 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Audi A4SpecificationFord Ranger
DieselFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank80 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi A4SpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/50 R17Tyre size215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi A4SpecificationFord Ranger
4701 mmLength5277-5354 mm
1826 mmWidth1860 mm
1427 mmHeight1815 mm
1575 KgWeight1883 Kg
2808 mmWheelbase3220 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Audi A4 and 2016 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…