DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Ranger vs 2014 Audi A4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford RangerSpecificationAudi A4
FordMakeAudi
RangerModelA4
2016Model year2014
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Ford RangerSpecificationAudi A4
—0–100 km/h7,7 s
175 km/hTop speed244 km/h
3198 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
200 HPPower204 HP
470 NmTorque400 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Ford RangerSpecificationAudi A4
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption6,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford RangerSpecificationAudi A4
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford RangerSpecificationAudi A4
5277-5354 mmLength4701 mm
1860 mmWidth1826 mm
1815 mmHeight1427 mm
1883 KgWeight1575 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2808 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Ranger and 2014 Audi A4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…