DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-3 vs 2000 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-3SpecificationBMW Z3
MazdaMakeBMW
MX-3ModelZ3
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
2+2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

Mazda MX-3SpecificationBMW Z3
8,5 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
230 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1845 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
129 HPPower118 HP
157 NmTorque190 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-3SpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank51 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption11 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-3SpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R15Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-3SpecificationBMW Z3
4220 mmLength4050 mm
1695 mmWidth1740 mm
1310 mmHeight1288 mm
1145 KgWeight1220 Kg
2455 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-3 and 2000 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…