DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Mazda MX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
FreelanderModelMX-3
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
165 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1845 cc
120 HPPower129 HP
165 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank50 lt
13 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size205/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4382 mmLength4220 mm
1805 mmWidth1695 mm
1760 mmHeight1310 mm
1380 KgWeight1145 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2455 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Mazda MX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…