DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-3 vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLand Rover
MX-3ModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
230 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1845 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
129 HPPower120 HP
157 NmTorque165 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank59 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption13 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/55 R15Tyre size195/80 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4220 mmLength4382 mm
1695 mmWidth1805 mm
1310 mmHeight1760 mm
1145 KgWeight1380 Kg
2455 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-3 and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…