DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda MX-3 vs 1996 Audi A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-3SpecificationAudi A6
MazdaMakeAudi
MX-3ModelA6
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Mazda MX-3SpecificationAudi A6
8,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
230 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1845 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
129 HPPower115 HP
157 NmTorque168 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-3SpecificationAudi A6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
—Average consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-3SpecificationAudi A6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R15Tyre size195/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-3SpecificationAudi A6
4220 mmLength4797 mm
1695 mmWidth1783 mm
1310 mmHeight1430 mm
1145 KgWeight1355 Kg
2455 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda MX-3 and 1996 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…