DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi A6 vs 1996 Mazda MX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A6SpecificationMazda MX-3
AudiMakeMazda
A6ModelMX-3
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

Audi A6SpecificationMazda MX-3
11,9 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
190 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1845 cc
115 HPPower129 HP
168 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A6SpecificationMazda MX-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
8,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A6SpecificationMazda MX-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R16Tyre size205/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A6SpecificationMazda MX-3
4797 mmLength4220 mm
1783 mmWidth1695 mm
1430 mmHeight1310 mm
1355 KgWeight1145 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2455 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi A6 and 1996 Mazda MX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…