DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda MX-3 vs 1996 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
MX-3ModelMondeo
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h13,2 s
197 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
107 HPPower90 HP
134 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank61 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3975 mmLength4556 mm
1675 mmWidth1751 mm
1230 mmHeight1427 mm
990 KgWeight1371 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda MX-3 and 1996 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…