DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Citroen AX vs 1996 Mazda MX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMazda
AXModelMX-3
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
3Doors2

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
186 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1361 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
95 HPPower107 HP
117 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank48 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R13Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3517 mmLength3975 mm
1596 mmWidth1675 mm
1340 mmHeight1230 mm
795 KgWeight990 Kg
2280 mmWheelbase2265 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Citroen AX and 1996 Mazda MX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…