DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda MX-3 vs 1996 Citroen AX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeCitroen
MX-3ModelAX
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
197 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1361 cc
107 HPPower95 HP
134 NmTorque117 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank43 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/60 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3975 mmLength3517 mm
1675 mmWidth1596 mm
1230 mmHeight1340 mm
990 KgWeight795 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2280 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda MX-3 and 1996 Citroen AX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…