DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-3 vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeAlfa Romeo
MX-3Model156
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
197 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
105 HPPower120 HP
135 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank63 lt
9 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4220 mmLength4430 mm
1695 mmWidth1745 mm
1310 mmHeight1415 mm
1060 KgWeight1230 Kg
2455 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-3 and 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…