2000 • Alfa Romeo
156
Alfa Romeo 156 1.6 16V T.S. (120 Hp) 2000Overall Score53.5/100
2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2000 Mazda MX-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
MX-3
Mazda MX-3 1.6 16V (105 Hp) 2000Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Mazda MX-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationMazda MX-3
Alfa RomeoMakeMazda
156ModelMX-3
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2
Performance
Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationMazda MX-3
10,5 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
200 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower105 HP
144 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationMazda MX-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption9 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationMazda MX-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationMazda MX-3
4430 mmLength4220 mm
1745 mmWidth1695 mm
1415 mmHeight1310 mm
1230 KgWeight1060 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2455 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2000 Mazda MX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…