DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-3 vs 2000 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
MX-3ModelFocus
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
197 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
105 HPPower90 HP
135 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank53 lt
9 ltUrban consumption6,7 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4220 mmLength4152 mm
1695 mmWidth1698 mm
1310 mmHeight1430 mm
1060 KgWeight1183 Kg
2455 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-3 and 2000 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…