DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda MX-3 vs 1996 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
MX-3ModelMegane
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
197 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
105 HPPower98 HP
135 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
9 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4220 mmLength4440 mm
1695 mmWidth1699 mm
1310 mmHeight1420 mm
1060 KgWeight1135 Kg
2455 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda MX-3 and 1996 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…