DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda MPV vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MPVSpecificationMG ZR
MazdaMakeMG
MPVModelZR
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda MPVSpecificationMG ZR
13,2 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
176 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
136 HPPower113 HP
310 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MPVSpecificationMG ZR
DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MPVSpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MPVSpecificationMG ZR
4805 mmLength4011 mm
1830 mmWidth1690 mm
1785 mmHeight1400 mm
1807 KgWeight1155 Kg
2840 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda MPV and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…