DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Mazda MPV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationMazda MPV
RoverMakeMazda
25ModelMPV
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
3/5Doors5

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationMazda MPV
9,1 s0–100 km/h13,2 s
185 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
113 HPPower136 HP
260 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationMazda MPV
DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank75 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationMazda MPV
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationMazda MPV
3990 mmLength4805 mm
1688 mmWidth1830 mm
1419 mmHeight1785 mm
1130 KgWeight1807 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2840 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Mazda MPV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…