DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda Laputa vs 1999 Mazda Laputa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Laputa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
LaputaModelLaputa
2003Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement657 cc
55 HPPower55 HP
61 NmTorque61 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank30 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14 81 STyre size165/70 R14 81 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3395 mm
1475 mmWidth1475 mm
1545 mmHeight1545 mm
750 KgWeight750 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda Laputa and 1999 Mazda Laputa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Laputa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…