DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mazda Carol vs 2003 Mazda Laputa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Laputa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
CarolModelLaputa
1999Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

140 km/hTop speed0 km/h
658 ccEngine displacement657 cc
54 HPPower55 HP
61 NmTorque61 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank30 lt
8 ltUrban consumption—
4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13 75 STyre size165/70 R14 81 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3395 mm
1475 mmWidth1475 mm
1450 mmHeight1545 mm
630 KgWeight750 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mazda Carol and 2003 Mazda Laputa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Laputa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…