E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mazda Laputa vs 2003 Subaru R2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru R2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda LaputaSpecificationSubaru R2
MazdaMakeSubaru
LaputaModelR2
1999Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda LaputaSpecificationSubaru R2
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
658 ccEngine displacement658 cc
64 HPPower64 HP
106 NmTorque84 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda LaputaSpecificationSubaru R2
PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank30 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda LaputaSpecificationSubaru R2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
165/60 R15 77 HTyre size155/65 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda LaputaSpecificationSubaru R2
3395 mmLength3395 mm
1475 mmWidth1475 mm
1530 mmHeight1520 mm
780 KgWeight770 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mazda Laputa and 2003 Subaru R2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru R2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Image unavailableVS1999 Mazda LaputaMazda Az-offroad vs Mazda Laputa2000 and 1999 model yearsImage unavailableVS1999 Mazda LaputaMazda Az-wagon vs Mazda Laputa2000 and 1999 model years2000 Mazda LaputaVS1999 Mazda LaputaMazda Laputa vs Mazda Laputa2000 and 1999 model years2000 Subaru PleoVS1999 Mazda LaputaSubaru Pleo vs Mazda Laputa2000 and 1999 model years2000 Suzuki JimnyVS1999 Mazda LaputaSuzuki Jimny vs Mazda Laputa2000 and 1999 model years

Comments are loading…