DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Az-offroad vs 1999 Mazda Laputa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Az-offroad

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
Az-offroadModelLaputa
2000Model year1999
EstateBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

125 km/hTop speed0 km/h
658 ccEngine displacement658 cc
64 HPPower64 HP
106 NmTorque106 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank30 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/65 R16Tyre size165/60 R15 77 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3395 mm
1475 mmWidth1475 mm
1680 mmHeight1530 mm
960 KgWeight780 Kg
2250 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Az-offroad and 1999 Mazda Laputa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Az-offroad leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…