DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mazda Laputa vs 2000 Subaru Pleo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Pleo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSubaru
LaputaModelPleo
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed130 km/h
658 ccEngine displacement658 cc
64 HPPower64 HP
106 NmTorque89 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank32 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
165/60 R15 77 HTyre size145/70 R12
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3395 mm
1475 mmWidth1475 mm
1530 mmHeight1580 mm
780 KgWeight820 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2310 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mazda Laputa and 2000 Subaru Pleo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Pleo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…