DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mazda Eunos Cosmo vs 1996 Cadillac Catera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Eunos Cosmo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeCadillac
Eunos CosmoModelCatera
1995Model year1996
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,5 s
230 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2616 ccEngine displacement2962 cc
230 HPPower203 HP
294 NmTorque260 Nm
—Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/60 R15 VTyre size225/55 HR16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4815 mmLength4930 mm
1795 mmWidth1790 mm
1305 mmHeight1430 mm
1510 KgWeight1710 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mazda Eunos Cosmo and 1996 Cadillac Catera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Eunos Cosmo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…