DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Cadillac Catera vs 1995 Mazda Eunos Cosmo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Eunos Cosmo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

72.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeMazda
CateraModelEunos Cosmo
1996Model year1995
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
204 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2962 ccEngine displacement2616 cc
203 HPPower230 HP
260 NmTorque294 Nm
6Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank72 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/55 HR16Tyre size215/60 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4930 mmLength4815 mm
1790 mmWidth1795 mm
1430 mmHeight1305 mm
1710 KgWeight1510 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Cadillac Catera and 1995 Mazda Eunos Cosmo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Eunos Cosmo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…