DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Mazda Eunos Cosmo vs 1991 BMW M3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Eunos Cosmo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeBMW
Eunos CosmoModelM3
1993Model year1991
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,3 s
230 km/hTop speed239 km/h
2616 ccEngine displacement2302 cc
230 HPPower215 HP
294 NmTorque230 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank62 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption12,5 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
—Average consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/60 R15 VTyre size205/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4815 mmLength4345 mm
1795 mmWidth1680 mm
1305 mmHeight1370 mm
1510 KgWeight1360 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2565 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Mazda Eunos Cosmo and 1991 BMW M3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Eunos Cosmo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…