1991 • BMW
M3
BMW M3 2.3 (215 Hp) 1991Overall Score72.5/100
1991 BMW M3 vs 1993 Mazda Eunos Cosmo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1993 • Mazda
Eunos Cosmo
Mazda Eunos Cosmo 1993Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Eunos Cosmo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
72.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW M3SpecificationMazda Eunos Cosmo
BMWMakeMazda
M3ModelEunos Cosmo
1991Model year1993
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
4Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
BMW M3SpecificationMazda Eunos Cosmo
7,3 s0–100 km/h—
239 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2302 ccEngine displacement2616 cc
215 HPPower230 HP
230 NmTorque294 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
BMW M3SpecificationMazda Eunos Cosmo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank72 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
8,0 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
BMW M3SpecificationMazda Eunos Cosmo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/55 R15Tyre size215/60 R15 V
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW M3SpecificationMazda Eunos Cosmo
4345 mmLength4815 mm
1680 mmWidth1795 mm
1370 mmHeight1305 mm
1360 KgWeight1510 Kg
2565 mmWheelbase2750 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1991 BMW M3 and 1993 Mazda Eunos Cosmo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Eunos Cosmo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…