DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Demio vs 1999 Lada 2109 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Demio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLada
DemioModel2109
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
160 km/hTop speed156 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1500 cc
75 HPPower72 HP
116 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank43 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption8 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/60R14Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

3815 mmLength4006 mm
1670 mmWidth1650 mm
1535 mmHeight1402 mm
970 KgWeight945 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Demio and 1999 Lada 2109 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Demio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…