DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Lada 2110 vs 2000 Mazda Demio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Demio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LadaMakeMazda
2110ModelDemio
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
165 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1500 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
73 HPPower75 HP
109 NmTorque116 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank40 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 SR13Tyre size175/60R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4277 mmLength3815 mm
1676 mmWidth1670 mm
1430 mmHeight1535 mm
1010 KgWeight970 Kg
2492 mmWheelbase2390 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Lada 2110 and 2000 Mazda Demio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Demio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…