DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Demio vs 1999 Daihatsu Charade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Demio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeDaihatsu
DemioModelCharade
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
160 km/hTop speed152 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
116 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/60R14Tyre size155/80 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3815 mmLength4085 mm
1670 mmWidth1620 mm
1535 mmHeight1390 mm
970 KgWeight885 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2395 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Demio and 1999 Daihatsu Charade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Demio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…