DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda Demio vs 2003 Ford Fusion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Fusion

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
DemioModelFusion
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,9 s
0 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1349 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
91 HPPower90 HP
124 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption5,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
175/60 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

3925 mmLength4020 mm
1680 mmWidth1708 mm
1530 mmHeight1503 mm
1100 KgWeight1105 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2488 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda Demio and 2003 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Fusion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…