DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Lancia Musa vs 2003 Mazda Demio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Musa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeMazda
MusaModelDemio
2004Model year2003
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h—
173 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1349 cc
90 HPPower91 HP
200 NmTorque124 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/60 R15Tyre size175/60 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3985 mmLength3925 mm
1698 mmWidth1680 mm
1688 mmHeight1530 mm
1200 KgWeight1100 Kg
2508 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Lancia Musa and 2003 Mazda Demio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Musa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…