DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda Demio vs 2003 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeCitroen
DemioModelC3
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,9 s
0 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1349 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
91 HPPower90 HP
124 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption5,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,7 lt
—Average consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
175/60 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3925 mmLength3850 mm
1680 mmWidth1667 mm
1530 mmHeight1529 mm
1100 KgWeight1072 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda Demio and 2003 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…