DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda Demio vs 2003 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Demio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeCitroen
DemioModelC3
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,1 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
170 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
72 HPPower68 HP
105 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
40 ltFuel tank45 lt
7 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3815 mmLength3850 mm
1670 mmWidth1667 mm
1535 mmHeight1529 mm
950 KgWeight1022 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda Demio and 2003 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Demio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…