DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Citroen C3 vs 2003 Mazda Demio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Demio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMazda
C3ModelDemio
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,4 s0–100 km/h13,1 s
165 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1398 ccEngine displacement1324 cc
68 HPPower72 HP
150 NmTorque105 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank40 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption7 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3850 mmLength3815 mm
1667 mmWidth1670 mm
1529 mmHeight1535 mm
1022 KgWeight950 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2390 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Citroen C3 and 2003 Mazda Demio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Demio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…