DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda CX-9 vs 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMitsubishi
CX-9ModelPajero
2010Model year2010
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats7
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3828 cc
273 HPPower250 HP
270 NmTorque329 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank88 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption17,7 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption11,2 lt
—Average consumption13,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
245/60 R18; 245/50 R20Tyre size265/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5085-5100 mmLength4385 mm
1935 mmWidth1875 mm
1727 mmHeight1870 mm
1964 KgWeight2035 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda CX-9 and 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…