DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs 2010 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Grand Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeMazda
Grand CherokeeModelCX-9
2010Model year2010
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3701 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
214 HPPower273 HP
319 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank76 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/65 R17Tyre size245/60 R18; 245/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength5085-5100 mm
1862 mmWidth1935 mm
1720 mmHeight1727 mm
2014 KgWeight1964 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2010 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Grand Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…