DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mazda CX-9 vs 2005 Toyota Aristo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeToyota
CX-9ModelAristo
2009Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

192 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
263 HPPower280 HP
339 NmTorque432 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank75 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption—
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
245/60R18; 245/50 R20Tyre size225/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5074 mmLength4865 mm
1936 mmWidth1800 mm
1728 mmHeight1435 mm
2064 KgWeight1680 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mazda CX-9 and 2005 Toyota Aristo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…