DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Lincoln LS vs 2009 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeMazda
LSModelCX-9
2004Model year2009
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

230 km/hTop speed192 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
284 HPPower263 HP
388 NmTorque339 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank76 lt
16 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
235/50 R17Tyre size245/60R18; 245/50 R20
YesABS—

Dimensions

4925 mmLength5074 mm
1860 mmWidth1936 mm
1450 mmHeight1728 mm
1710 KgWeight2064 Kg
2910 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Lincoln LS and 2009 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…