DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mazda CX-9 vs 2004 Lincoln LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLincoln
CX-9ModelLS
2009Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

192 km/hTop speed230 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
263 HPPower284 HP
339 NmTorque388 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank68 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption16 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
245/60R18; 245/50 R20Tyre size235/50 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5074 mmLength4925 mm
1936 mmWidth1860 mm
1728 mmHeight1450 mm
2064 KgWeight1710 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase2910 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mazda CX-9 and 2004 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…