DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Mazda CX-9 vs 2004 Infiniti FX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeInfiniti
CX-9ModelFX
2008Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

192 km/hTop speed221 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
263 HPPower283 HP
339 NmTorque366 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank90 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
245/60R18; 245/50 R20Tyre size265/60 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5074 mmLength4803 mm
1936 mmWidth1925 mm
1728 mmHeight1674 mm
2064 KgWeight1960 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Mazda CX-9 and 2004 Infiniti FX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…