DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chrysler Concorde vs 2008 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeMazda
ConcordeModelCX-9
2004Model year2008
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

225 km/hTop speed192 km/h
3518 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
258 HPPower263 HP
348 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank76 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size245/60R18; 245/50 R20
YesABS—

Dimensions

5310 mmLength5074 mm
1890 mmWidth1936 mm
1435 mmHeight1728 mm
1690 KgWeight2064 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chrysler Concorde and 2008 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…