DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Mazda CX-7 vs 2007 KTM X-Bow Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–79.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda CX-7SpecificationKTM X-Bow
MazdaMakeKTM
CX-7ModelX-Bow
2007Model year2007
Off-road vehicleBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
5Doors—

Performance

Mazda CX-7SpecificationKTM X-Bow
—0–100 km/h3,9 s
0 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2260 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
260 HPPower240 HP
380 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda CX-7SpecificationKTM X-Bow
PetrolFuel typePetrol
69 ltFuel tank40 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda CX-7SpecificationKTM X-Bow
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/60 R18Tyre size205/40 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda CX-7SpecificationKTM X-Bow
4675 mmLength3738 mm
1872 mmWidth1915 mm
1645 mmHeight1202 mm
1782 KgWeight790 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Mazda CX-7 and 2007 KTM X-Bow approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…