2004 • Volvo
S60
Volvo S60 2.3 20V (250 Hp) 2004Overall Score79.5/100
2004 Volvo S60 vs 2007 Mazda CX-7 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2007 • Mazda
CX-7
Mazda CX-7 2.3 i 16V 4WD (260 Hp) 2007Overall Score78.75/100
WINNER
Volvo S60
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S60SpecificationMazda CX-7
VolvoMakeMazda
S60ModelCX-7
2004Model year2007
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S60SpecificationMazda CX-7
6,8 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2319 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
250 HPPower260 HP
330 NmTorque380 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S60SpecificationMazda CX-7
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank69 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption13 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S60SpecificationMazda CX-7
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
215/55 R16Tyre size235/60 R18
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S60SpecificationMazda CX-7
4576 mmLength4675 mm
1804 mmWidth1872 mm
1428 mmHeight1645 mm
1537 KgWeight1782 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2750 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Volvo S60 and 2007 Mazda CX-7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…