DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mazda CX-5 vs 2015 SsangYong Rexton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.75–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSsangYong
CX-5ModelRexton
2015Model year2015
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
202 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower155 HP
380 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank78 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
6Gears6
—TransmissionAutomatic
—Tyre size18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4755 mm
1840 mmWidth1900 mm
1710 mmHeight1840 mm
1445 KgWeight1925 kg
—Luggage capacity250 lt
2700 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Mazda CX-5

No additional feature records are available.

SsangYong RextonDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mazda CX-5 and 2015 SsangYong Rexton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…