2015 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (130 Hp) 2015Overall Score73.5/100
2015 Ford Ranger vs 2015 Mazda CX-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 2.2 (150 Hp) 2015Overall Score72.75/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
73.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda CX-5
FordMakeMazda
RangerModelCX-5
2015Model year2015
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda CX-5
—0–100 km/h9,2 s
165 km/hTop speed202 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
130 HPPower150 HP
330 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda CX-5
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption5,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda CX-5
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda CX-5
5277-5354 mmLength4555 mm
1860 mmWidth1840 mm
1815 mmHeight1710 mm
1883 KgWeight1445 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Ford Ranger and 2015 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…